Children Belong to Their Parents, Not the State. (EXPOSED: CPS caseworker Annette Monson, Susan Manning, Utah Attorney Bud Israel Powell, Police, Steven Cragun, Judge Brody Keisel, Family Law Courts)

 

Annette Monson and Susan Manning caught lying

God gave children to parents to protect children. 

Parents protect kids from liars, thieves, predators and criminals, many of whom exist and are embedded in plain sight in government departments and agencies such as public (gov't) schools and especially within the unconstitutional so-called Children Protective Services (CPS) as it is called in most states across America or variations of this deceptive name.

Therefore, although government departments and agencies such as public schools and Children Protective Services (CPS) claim they are the ones who protect children and families, the exact opposite is true more of the time, as government schools and CPS do great harm and cause much trauma to children and families.

The real name of Children Protective Services is Children Predatory Services. Remember everything is always the opposite with these corrupt unconstitutional government cartels. Or at least almost always the opposite. CPS doesn't serve anyone but themselves. And they do not protect children. CPS grooms and gaslights children to remove them away from the protection of their parents.

CPS caseworkers and the whole fake department do not make money unless children are being taken away from good parents and families. If no money is being made (stolen), then CPS does not exist. CPS is nothing more than a business. 

CPS is a criminal business like the mafia, propped up and supported by a house of cards of lies and deception from a fraudulent unconstitutional court system that participates right along side CPS in the violation of your rights.

The so-called "family law" courts is another business and is also unconstitutional since your rights are constantly violated with court orders that violate the law and violate your rights as will be demonstrated in a moment by the sharing of my personal experience dealing with these satanic entities and their minions.

Also see: ARTICLE: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS MEAN NOTHING IN FAMILY COURT

And many of these government departments are not even legal or constitutional such as the so-called Children Protective (Predatory) Services. 

If a crime is being committed you contact non-corrupt law enforcement to report a crime. The end. Law enforcement will enforce the law if they're not corrupt. There is no need for CPS when you have actual law enforcement. 

There is no need for CPS other than to violate your rights. Your very rights that protect your children and family. Your rights are Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy. A violation of these rights is a crime. A violation of these God-given rights harms you, thus by definition a crime is the violation of your rights because that is how harm is caused. The only reason criminal CPS exists is to violate your rights of Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy. CPS violates your rights by illegally snooping around and trespassing in homes without search warrants to fabricate and falsify the truth in order to get gain over children and families. 

Or if a warrant is obtained, it is often due to lies told to the judge or signed off on by a judge who does whatever CPS wants, as will also be demonstrated further in this article, even when there isn't any real evidence or credible probable cause. 

How does the author of this post know all of this? Because I experienced all of this and I am a direct witness to the fraud, corruption and crimes (violation of rights) by CPS and their flying monkeys.

1. TRESPASSING (Violation of Property and Privacy Rights): Utah CPS / DCFS Caseworker, Annette Monson, entered my home without permission. Annette Monson appeared at our door. I opened it. She then walked right in and then after she was in our home asked, "can I come in?" 

I let her know I did not approve of her actions. Annette Monson then wrote in her CPS log report quote, "Timothy indicated he felt it was a little rude that I showed up unannounced but let me into the home."

No, I did not let her into our home. She lied in her coverup report, as usual. 

Later in May 2022 when I was complaining to Annette Monson and her supervisor, Dave Stevens, in person about her trespassing in our home, Monson initially claimed, "I don't remember doing that."

I incredulously responded of course she knew exactly what I was talking about. Then I explained the law to her saying that unless someone explicitly invites you into their home, you are trespassing. 

Monson's supervisor, Dave Stevens, backed me up saying I was correct.

Then the look on Monson's face changed and she then claimed she thought she could just walk into people's homes, thus admitting that she does enter homes without permission and she knows she trespasses.

I then said to her, "...after 17 years of being a caseworker, you didn't know that you can't trespass?"

Of course she knew that. How could she not after being a caseworker at this point for 17 years?

I also asked Annette Monson if she realized that people make false allegations in order to weaponize CPS against others?

To which Annette Monson replied, "Yes, but that only happens in divorce cases."

Only happens in divorce?", was the reply by the father. Why would false accusations only be limited to divorce cases?

So why exactly is the possibility of CPS being weaponized against others "only happens in divorce cases" Annette?

And you're an "investigator" at this point for 17 years and these are the claims you're making after 17 years that you expect us to believe Annette?

So Annette Monson dismissed any possibility that Susan Manning could be trying to weaponize CPS because this was not a divorce case and according to Annette Monson weaponization of CPS "only happens in divorce cases." 

The reason Susan Manning so easily lied and weaponized CPS is because CPS enables or emboldens psychopaths like Susan Manning to lie and weaponize CPS against others because psychopaths like Susan Manning know CPS routinely does not actually investigate allegations, CPS does not apply any scrutiny to the allegations being presented to them to see if the allegations withstand the scrutiny test, CPS routinely is easily duped by their own choosing, routinely easily believes lies, routinely is biased against one of the parties which influences their investigating or lack thereof, etc.

2. IMAGINING "EVIDENCE" (Violation of Privacy Rights ie: 4th and 5th amendments)  ie: harassment, acting falsely under the color of law without any authority, pre-conceived bias, etc. to get someone without evidence: Another time on a 12 minute 14 second phone call to Annette Monson on July 19, 2022 when I called to complain after receiving court documents proving that there was NO EVIDENCE and thus now confronting her with the information I had now obtained of NO EVIDENCE, Monson twice said to me, "I GUESS I MADE ASSUMPTIONS"!

Then Monson said that she "IMAGINED" evidence. Monson said "I IMAGINED" there could be evidence that she hoped that she was going to later find that would unjustly justify her and everyone else for violating our rights.

3. IGNORING ACTUAL EVIDENCE THAT PROVED OUR INNOCENCE (Violation of Privacy - 4th and 5th amendments): Annette Monson testified under oath that the false accuser Susan Manning was NOT credible. 

Who is Susan Manning? See here: Beware of Susan Manning: A Warning to Other Parents and Families

See that under oath testimony in this video here: 

Annette Monson testified quote (as seen in above video): 

"This is a log that Dave [Stevens] made on June 2nd. 'After a visit between Hailee and her mother I received a text from grandmother (Susan Manning). Text said Hailee was disappointed because her mother had called her disgusting. Stated that Hailee was in tears. I immediately made a trip to Susan's house. Talked with Hailee and Susan. Susan told me Hailee was uncomfortable during the visit because her mom called her disgusting. I asked Susan if I could talk with Hailee. I visited with Hailee. Asked her to tell me what made her uncomfortable. She told me she was uncomfortable when mom said she was disappointed in that her texts were disgusting. Hailee reported to me that her mom did NOT say that she was disgusting. But that she was disappointed because she had been sending disgusting texts. I asked Hailee what texts she was talking about. She told me she sent some texts talking about people drinking and using the F-word in a couple of texts. She also told me she was upset because of the conversation but understands why her mother was upset.'

So just conversations like that he (Dave Stevens) was feeling like grandmother (Susan Manning) was taking things and spinning them to make them more extreme." 

-End of under oath testimony segment.-

Not only did Annette Monson testify that Susan Manning was NOT credible due to her supervisor, Dave Stevens, investigation, but also because of the text messages which were uncovered proving our innocence. 

Yet during this hearing when Annette Monson testified Susan Manning was NOT credible, Monson simultaneously was still regurgitating Susan Manning's false accusations which were DISMISSED and which were PROVEN false over a year earlier.

False accusations such as the 16-year-old was "ISOLATED" and "TRAPPED". 

See these text messages proving our innocence which Annette Monson ignored here: "Did Annette Monson get fired for this? These text messages are so damning to their manipulation of the situation!"
 

And here: Beware of Susan Manning: A Warning to Other Parents and Families

And watch here: https://youtu.be/lBO2RHnsBSY

CPS Supervisor, Dave Stevens, called me, Timothy McGaffin, on the phone on June 10, 2023 and said that he conducted his own investigation. He then reported the following things to me that were "now clear" to him from his investigation:

1."Tim, it's now clear that Susan (Susan Manning) lied about everything." Dave Stevens said "there wasn't even any half-truths" mixed in with lies but that it was all lies. Dave Stevens also said quote, "there wasn't even a sliver of truth."
2. "CPS definitely made mistakes."
3. "Changes need to be made at CPS."
4. CPS caseworker Annette Monson got seduced by Susan Manning's lies.

And Dave Stevens said that CPS / DCFS "definitely made mistakes" and that "changes are going to be made"  and that the problem is not just CPS but it is systemic, meaning the police, lawyers, judges, district attorneys making "mistakes" (violating rights) and not doing what is right, that is the problem too.

Dave Stevens said these are the following changes that CPS / DCFS needs to make:

1. NO MORE TRESPASSING into people's homes.
(Annette Monson trespassed in our home)
2. CPS needs to review / verify actual evidence, NOT make anymore assumptions.
3. Be careful of collateral information from all sources.

Lastly, returning to the subject of Annette Monson violating our rights we highlighted 3 things so far which were, 1. trespassing, 2. imagining evidence ie: harassment, acting falsely under the color of law without any authority, pre-conceived bias, etc. to get someone without evidence, 3. ignoring actual evidence that proved our innocence and now the fourth violation of our rights:

4. Annette Monson routinely made FALSE STATEMENTS on her CPS logs and also on documents submitted to the courts (Violation of all rights Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy when you bear false witness to get someone, ie: PERJURY):

For example I already gave the example when Monson falsely reported she was given permission to enter our home when we did not consent. Another example in particular, among many others, is on her CPS log report dated, May 18, 2022.

See screenshot here (click to enlarge):

On this CPS log report first, Annette Monson falsely states this manufactured recording was 1 hour long which was false because half of the so-called "recording" was dead air from the hidden recording device being placed in the hallway at night trying to record my wife and I talking in the privacy of our bedroom with our door closed. 

Next, Annette Monson says this recording is proof of "emotionally abusing" (emotional abuse).

And simultaneously Monson states quote, "He (Bud Powell) will send this to me and Oliver." 

Therefore Annette Monson has NOT even listened to the magical recording yet because she has not had it sent to her yet. She does NOT have it to even listen to, yet Monson has magically already determined and falsely stated that the falsely-accused is guilty of emotional abuse WITHOUT EVER LISTENING TO THE RECORDING!

Also, Susan Manning had this recording for about 4 months and Manning sat on this magical recording and hyped it up as the smoking gun "evidence" to Bud Powell, but never turning it over to police. 

This recording contained so much so-called imagined "evidence" that Guardian Ad Litem scum attorney, Bud Israel Powell, flat-out LIED saying that I said, "stepchildren are 2nd-class citizens"!

I NEVER SAID "stepchildren are 2nd-class citizens". TOTALLY FABRICATED, pathetic and laughable by Bud Powell and regurgitated by Annette Monson as if it is FACT, yet Monson hasn't even listened to this magical recording yet.

So there was so much "evidence" that they had to lie and completely make stuff up rather than just present it to the court and let their "evidence" speak for itself.

And where in this report is the word "alleged" ever used? Everything is stated as if it is FACT. In journalism if we don't say "alleged" and imply someone was found guilty when they were not, that journalist can get sued. And it should be no different for Bud Powell and Annette Monson.

First, Bud Powell lied to the court to obtain a fake "shelter hearing" scheduled for May 19, 2022. You'll notice in the screenshot of the CPS log report, that the report of when Bud Powell obtained the magical recording from Susan Manning was May 18, 2022, the day before the hearing.

Please see how Bud Powell lied to even obtain the court hearing here:
Warning: Attorney Bud Powell and CPS Caseworker Annette Monson: A Love Affair of Dishonesty

Then Bud Powell lied to Annette Monson about the content of the recording. (ie: "stepchildren are 2nd-class citizens")

Next, the recording was NEVER given to the defense. All so-called "evidence" or exhibits have to be provided to both sides.

Why was it not provided to the defense?

Deductive reasoning would come to the conclusion that if the defense had a copy of this recording, the defense would have been able to destroy it at the hearing. The only way the defense can't defend itself against any material is if they don't have the material given to them to defend.

During the hearing, Bud Powell started talking about this magical recording and telling the court I said "stepchildren are 2nd-class citizens" which was a complete LIE.

Bud Powell NEVER played any part of the recording. 

Never played even one snippet or soundbite.

And Powell also lied and fabricated other statements that he claimed I said that I never said, hoping to catch me in some gotcha question. None of his trick questioning worked. 

I go over in more detail about Bud Powell's trick questions and fabricated claims of me saying things I never said here: Warning: Attorney Bud Powell and CPS Caseworker Annette Monson: A Love Affair of Dishonesty

For example, Bud Powell asked me, "Isn't it true you told the 16-year-old to not talk to law enforcement?"

I never said that. I told the 16-year-old to not talk to groomer and stalker and psychopath, Susan Manning, anymore.

And other times Bud Powell would tell the court that he was now quoting something I said on the recording, and then ask me a question on the fabricated statement he just made up and attributed to me. And I would simply tell him, I did not say that.

Finally my attorney, Neil Skousen, brother of Joel Skousen and nephew of Cleon Skousen, interjected and told the judge the defense never received a copy of this magical recording. Only Bud Powell had the recording and no one else, other than Susan Manning who gave Bud Powell the copy the day before the shelter hearing. Neil Skousen requested that this magical recording and all testimony given on this recording should all be removed or stricken from the record.

Bud Powell was hoping the judge in this case, which was Judge Brody Keisel, was either too dumb or corrupt enough to allow the false testimony of this fabricated recording to enter into the court record.

And the reason why Bud Powell NEVER played any clips, or snippets or soundbites from this recording is because the recording was FABRICATED.

I finally got a copy of the recording over one year later after the case and all allegations were already completely DISMISSED with PREJUDICE and CLOSED.

I then listened to the recording for the first time and I immediately pointed out to my attorney and also to CPS supervisor Dave Stevens that the recording was altered and fabricated. 

I showed where I said two completely different things at two completely different spots in the recording. And then those two points of my voice were then copied and pasted together to form a new sentence saying something I never said and played again later in the recording in a new fabricated sentence I never said.

I proved the new fragment was two other sentences spliced from earlier in the recording and then duplicated or copied and pasted or re-combined together to create a new sentence later in the recording that I never said. 

There were other spots where my voice was in the middle of a word and all of the sudden it stopped, clearly showing something was deleted and then put next to a new conversation that didn't make sense. It was easy to see manipulation of the recording had occurred.

My attorney questioned Annette Monson who was under oath during a new hearing that I had asked for to get Annette Monson to testify for the first time under oath, so I could obtain more evidence of crimes committed against us by CPS and all involved. 

My attorney, Caleb Proulx, asked Annette Monson, "In fact you would acknowledge that Mr. McGaffin's voice STOPS SEVERAL TIMES in the middle of MULTIPLE WORDS!?"

Annette Monson: "YEAH"

Watch me prove this magical recording was manipulated ie: fabricated in this video here: https://youtu.be/lBO2RHnsBSY 

Therefore the magical recording Bud Powell presented to the court as "evidence" was not even real! It was fabricated!

That's why Bud Powell lied and said I said, "stepchildren are 2nd-class citizens." when I NEVER said something so ridiculous. 

And that's why Bud Powell NEVER provided a copy of the fake recording to the defense.

And that's why Bud Powell NEVER played any of the recording to the court, not even one snippet or soundbite.

And that's why Susan Manning NEVER gave a copy of the recording to the police.

CPS is full of liars, thieves, predators and criminals!

And that's why CPS lies about parents and demonizes parents, to try and get parents out of the way from protecting their children from CPS, which is full of liars, thieves, predators and criminals.

Groomers have to turn their victims against their parents because the groomer needs to get the vulnerable victim away from the protection of their parents. CPS is full of groomers such as Annette Monson. 

See more examples of Monson's grooming behavior here: "A Complaint Against Annette Monson (Corrupt Utah CPS Caseworker)"

Judge Brody Keisel does NOT follow the LAW. Rules in Favor of POLICY! Policy Does NOT Trump the LAW!:

Also at this May 19, 2022 hearing that Bud Powell got the court to agree to hold due to Bud Powell lying, the assistant Attorney General, named, Oliver Whaley, clearly and correctly stated to the court that the LAW is that parents do NOT have to talk to CPS, nor do parents have to allow their children to speak to CPS. 

Also Oliver Whaley stated that IF the parents ever did agree to allow their children to speak to CPS, that one or both parents can be present when CPS talks to a child.

THAT IS THE LAW.

Annette Monson and Bud Powell were trying to get the judge, Brody Keisel to order the parents to let Bud Powell talk to our children alone.

That's when Oliver Whaley, the Assistant Attorney General, stated what the LAW is.

Then the judge Brody Keisel asked for a response to what Oliver Whaley just said about the LAW and Annette Monson said, "well that may be the law, but our POLICY is that we get to talk to the children alone."

So then the judge, Brody Keisel, ridiculously orders the parents to allow Bud Powell and or CPS caseworkers to talk to our kids whenever Bud Powell or CPS want and the parents can stay inside the house and look through the windows and watch Bud Powell or CPS talk to the children but the parents are not allowed to listen or hear what Bud Powell is saying to the kids.

Completely ridiculous because it's unlawful to make a court order that is OPPOSITE of the LAW.

Judge Brody Keisel of Utah's Sixth District is not fit to be a judge since he doesn't follow the law.

That false order of Brody Keisel's never stood though. Bud Powell never spoke to any of our children, nor did CPS ever talk to any of our children. Prayer is more powerful than Satan and his minions.

POLICE LIE, FALSELY CLAIMING TIM McGAFFIN IS A CONVICTED FELON ON PROBATION OR PAROLE!:

Ephraim, Utah police Sergeant Steven Cragun, lied to judge Brody Keisel to obtain an Investigative Subpoena and Warrant on April 28, 2022.

Since there was no evidence, Steven Cragun told judge Brody Keisel when trying to obtain a warrant, that I, Tim McGaffin, was a convicted felon on probation or parole. 

Court documents showed judge Brody Keisel himself, when asked why he signed off on the warrant, saying the reason why was because he, Keisel was told I was a convicted felon on probation or parole.

I have ZERO CRIMINAL HISTORY! 

TOTALLY FABRICATED!

That false claim was the justification according to the court document asking Brody Keisel why he signed off on the warrant, to search our home and temporarily kidnap our kids and interrogate little children, without an attorney present, to desperately try and manipulate our children into saying something that the police could claim was "evidence".

IT DIDN'T WORK.

My 5-year-old son said "NO" 14 times to Officer Garff who interrogated my son without an attorney present. Garff wouldn't take no for an answer. Officer Garff asked leading questions, which is illegal, when they weren't getting my son to say what they wanted him to say. When Garff asked my son if anything happened recently that made him feel unsafe, my son responded that he didn't like being kidnapped by the police.

They had NO EVIDENCE so they had to LIE again (the felon lie). 

I remember talking to CPS supervisor Dave Stevens and telling him I was not a felon and he responded saying almost shocked, "You mean you're not a convicted felon?!"

And I and my wife in unison said "NO!"

And the look on Dave Stevens face was a realization that he had been lied to.

And then Dave Stevens told us he was going to figure out what was going on and that he was going to find out the truth.

And both me and my wife said, "GOOD!"

I later asked Dave Stevens if someone told him that I was a convicted felon and he said, yes, someone did tell him that. And I asked him who told him that but he conveniently couldn't remember. I don't know if he really couldn't remember or if he was trying to protect someone from getting in trouble.

Child Predatory Services Causes Immense Harm and Trauma to All Involved:

Now when my son, who was kidnapped and interrogated by the police without an attorney present, sees a police car he runs and hides due to how traumatizing it was for him to be temporarily taken away from his family by the police for those couple of hours.

Does how my son now reacts when he sees a police car indicate that CPS and the police protected my son or used, harmed, attempted to groom and traumatized my son?

And when reading the text messages of the 16-year-old and the 18-year-old step-daughters, they ask, "why would grandma (Susan Manning) do this right now? (rn)” 

With the 18-year-old saying because of grandma's behavior, the mental health of the 18-year-old is "back down completely".

And both teenagers saying they didn't want CPS "to be involved" and that "CPS does nothing but cause more drama."

Snapchat messages 1 of 4 (click to enlarge):

Vulnerable teenagers (ages 18, 16) that Susan Manning is grooming, asking "why would grandma do this right now? (rn)”

Grandma is Susan Manning.

Snapchat messages 2 of 4 (click to enlarge):

Conversation continued at top asking "why would grandma (Susan Manning) do this right now? (rn)"

Then saying they did not want CPS "to be involved" and "CPS does nothing but cause more drama"

Followed by teenager age 18 "DADDY" stating her mental health is:

"back down completely"

Because of what Susan Manning is doing, ie:
"why would grandma do this right now? (rn)" 

Does the content of these above two Snapchat messages indicate the teenagers were protected by CPS or used, groomed, harmed and/or traumatized by CPS?

April 29, 2022 Snapchat Messages 3 of 4:
(conversation expanded / continued from 2 of 4)

April 29, 2022 Snapchat Messages 4 of 4:

Conversation continued with the vulnerable 16-year-old, who is being groomed by Susan Manning, saying:
"well because i started the drama today i ran off
i should've just stayed home"

The 16-year-old "ran-off" into the arms / car of Susan Manning because she was being manipulated and groomed by Susan. Susan orchestrated the kidnapping of this teenager on April 28, 2022 in a very similar manner to how Susan Manning kidnapped her own daughter (the mother of this 16-year-old) 27 years before, when Susan's own daughter was also 16 years old. (See: "Beware of Susan Manning: A Warning to Other Parents and Families")

This 16-year-old was afraid of being found out and getting in trouble because she knew she had been lying to her parents and she knew her parents were now discovering her lies all clearly documented on her phone.

And this pre-planned next chapter of kidnapping 27 years later by Susan Manning is why Susan felt the need to get Annette Monson's permission this time around in order to avoid getting in trouble due to her prior history of kidnapping. (See: "Beware of Susan Manning: A Warning to Other Parents and Families") Because Susan knew if she could claim Annette Monson told her to get the 16-year-old out of the house, then Susan Manning could put the blame on someone else (CPS) for her own actions. Susan needed to create plausible deniability by inducing Annette Monson to do the bidding of Susan Manning.

Annette Monson did Susan's bidding when Monson knowingly and wrongfully gave that permission by texting Susan on April 28, 2022, "If Hailee can get out of the home and let the police know she doesn't feel safe going home, IT WOULD RAISE THE LEVEL OF DANGER. THAT WOULD HELP. Annette".

To read a timeline and history of Susan Manning's kidnappings and how she operates, including her prior kidnapping(s) of her ex-daughter 27 years prior when her ex-daughter was also 16 years old, go to: "Beware of Susan Manning: A Warning to Other Parents and Families"

So again, does the content of these above four Snapchat messages indicate the teenagers were protected by CPS? Or were these teenagers exploited and unprotected by CPS by being used, groomed, harmed and/or traumatized by the imaginations of Annette Monson and CPS and the enabling of Susan Manning's lies by CPS?

Please watch this full video when you have the time and listen to the end of the video where I share my testimony of miracles happening showing that even when it seems like God is not there, he is and God is of course more powerful than the powers of darkness.

Please WATCH THIS FULL VIDEO, including my testimony and extra never before heard details I share at the end of the video, when you have time please:

 
This article and title of this article, "Children Belong to Their Parents, Not the State" was inspired by a newsletter email I received from the great Dr. Simone Gold of America's Frontline Doctors, entitled, "They were REQUIRED to hide the truth from her parents"

Here is the majority of the content of this newsletter word-for-word:

"They were REQUIRED to hide the truth from her parents"

For nearly a year, a public school in California treated a young girl as a boy.

Her parents were never told.

They only learned the truth after their daughter attempted suicide.

This was not an accident.
This was not a misunderstanding.

California policy REQUIRES public schools to hide a child’s expressed ‘transgender’ status from parents and to facilitate a social “transition” at school, even over a parent’s express objections.

Read that again.

California policy requires schools to hide the truth from parents.

That level of arrogance should alarm every parent. Children belong to their parents, not the state.

That is why America’s Frontline Doctors just filed an amici curiae brief at the United States Supreme Court in Mirabelli v. Bonta, supporting an emergency petition to stop California from forcing schools to deceive families and to restore protections for parents and teachers who refuse to lie.

The parents in this case did everything right.

When they moved their daughter to another public school, they explicitly asked to be notified about her gender expression and the use of her legal name and biological pronouns.

The school refused.

State policy required secrecy.

To this day, these parents are still being kept in the dark about what is happening to their own child at school.

Teachers are being coerced as well.

Two Christian middle school teachers were given a list of students being socially transitioned. Most of the parents did not know. The teachers were required to use one set of names and pronouns in class and a different set when speaking to parents.

They were ordered to lie.

They went to court. They won protection. Then the Ninth Circuit stripped it away.

Teachers across California are being forced to deceive parents.

This is why AFLDS exists.
To defend parents, to protect children, and to stop the state from lying to families and claiming authority it does not have.

Social “transition” is not neutral. It is the entry point into an ideology that rejects biological reality and places children on a path to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, sterilization, loss of sexual function, lifelong medical dependency, and surgical mutilation of healthy bodies.

Parents are the last line of defense.
When the state cuts parents out, children suffer.

This case comes after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Mahmoud v. Taylor, which reaffirmed that parental rights are not negotiable. California is defying that ruling anyway.

If this regime is allowed to stand, no parent is safe from government intrusion.

Simone Gold, M.D., J.D.
Founder & President
America’s Frontline Doctors

-END OF NEWSLETTER-

I wanted to include the text of Simone Gold's newsletter today to show just like CPS lies and tries to get parents out of the way, so do government schools.

Earlier I talked about Susan Manning and linked to some evidence regarding her and who and what she is.

Susan Manning was preying upon the vulnerable teenage minds of some of my step-daughters, in the same way and using the same patterns that she did against her own daughter, who is now my dream wife, Cheri McGaffin.

Susan Manning preyed upon our children by grooming them, by trying to brainwash them and turn them against their parents because their parents PROTECT their children. And if a predator wants to prey upon an individual they need to get the child away from the protection of their parents.

Susan Manning is a groomer and so was every other liar and fraud I highlighted in this article today, CPS caseworker, Annette Monson, state attorney and former police officer, Bud Israel Powell, judge Brody Keisel, Ephraim, Utah police sergeant Steven Cragun, Officer Garff, and the whole family law court system because they all work in unison as professional liars to prey upon and profit off of children. And the only way they can be successful in their grooming, preying and profiting off of children is if they can get the parents out of the way and thus remove the children away from the protection of their parents.

If you have to lie and break the law and commit crimes by violating the God-given rights of Life, Liberty, Property and Privacy of others in order to "protect" children, you are not protecting children but rather you are causing great harm and traumatizing kids who are not for your profit or for your monetary gain. God gave children to their parents and their families to protect children. Satan, the fallen one, who is the father of lies and who wants to destroy what the Creator has made, including each of us who was made in the image of the Creator, disguises himself as good and embeds himself in unconstitutional satanic gov't agencies such as Children Predatory Services and government indoctrination centers (public schools) in order to harm us, our families and our children. And what Satan fears more than anything is Free Speech, in the sharing of the TRUTH, in the sharing of our personal testimonies because the word destroys his craft. The word (our testimonies) is like throwing water on the wicked witch. Therefore the word will go out and will testify that we are royal sons and daughters of a Heavenly King and Queen and Jesus Christ is coming back in the Second Coming and the greatest miracles never before heard or seen are still to come and Triumph and Victory will be ours!

Champions Never Quit!

Timothy McGaffin II